Latest Research
Home > Research > Latest Research
Sustainable Development of Life Service Resources: A New Framework Based on GIScience and Spatial Justice

2022-10-20

Article

Sustainable Development of Life Service Resources: A New Framework Based on GIScience and Spatial Justice

1  
School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China  
2  
China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China  
3  
School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China  
*  
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.  
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(9), 2031
Submission received: 8 March 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 23 April 2022


Author

张正峰.jpg

Zhengfeng Zhang, Professor, School of Public Administration and Policy, RUC

Abstract

The sustainable development goals (SDGs) reflect the pursuit of achieving spatial justice. Both SDG 1.4 and SDG 11.1 reflect a concern for urban services. Life service resources, which are the new concept proposed by the Chinese government, also call for sustainable development path. However, few studies have focused on the realization of spatial justice in life service resources. This paper proposes a two-level, four-step analysis framework composed of quantity, structure, pattern, and coupling coordination to perceive the spatial justice of life service resources. Based on remote sensing technology and geographic information science, this paper acquires and analyses multi-source data including population density, building outlines, point of interests, subway lines, etc. Furthermore, the case study in downtown Beijing found the following: (1) The total life service resources are extensive and varying in type; (2) regional differences are evident and low-level equilibrium and high-level priority development coexist; (3) life service resources are concentrated in contiguous and multi-centre clusters with a greater north–south than east–west difference; (4) the overall level of life service resources is low, specifically for “high in the centre and low in the periphery” and “high in the east and low in the west”. Future management should consider narrowing the development gap and formulating industry development plans to improve spatial justice. Finally, the comparison between Beijing and London and more cities in the future needs to consider the urban development stage, population density, and other aspects.

Click here to view the research airticle